I think Network Address Translation (NAT), which translates private and public IP addresses, is unnecessary overhead...
that will go away with IPv6. The elimination of NAT with IPv6 will offer major technical benefits by restoring the end-to-end principal of the Internet. With IPv6, enterprises will also get closer to end-to-end protection since the IPsec tunnel can initiate and terminate on the respective communication nodes; no intermediate gateway termination must take place. Additionally, the Authentication Header (AH), a core component of the IPsec protocol, is now an integral part of the connection. AH, which cannot be used in NAT environments, provides source authentication and integrity protection.
Users should make sure that their VPN providers offer true dual-stack IPsec implementations, supporting both IPv4 and IPv6 at the same time. Transport Relay Translator (TRT) nodes, as described by RFC 3142, do not support IPsec across those protocol relays which can pose challenges to VPN network traffic.
Email your VPN-related questions to [email protected].
Dig Deeper on Network Security
Related Q&A from Rainer Enders
Rainer Enders explains how to allow certain users to access a VPN client while restricting others. Continue Reading
In this Ask the Expert response, Rainer Enders explains how to disable VPN passthrough and what the benefits and drawbacks are. Continue Reading
Our VPN expert explains why a Layer 3 VPN can ping but not do a tracepath from the client in this response. Continue Reading