Some servers in our network (connected with GIGAswitch switches) sometimes have high latency peaks of more than 10 milliseconds (msec) that are usually at less than or equal to 1 msec latency. Those servers are intensive memory, CPU, and disk, and network at about 30 to 40% average usage. Do those components have any correlation with the fact that network monitoring shows high latency sometimes?
ping packets are processed on the
and don't tend to go through the upper levels of the
model for processing. So typically this is not the case. However it's possible that the NIC activity would impact its ability to respond to packets. If the NIC(s) are exceptionally busy they could create queuing and processing delay on the NIC which might result in higher ping response times. A much better way to understand what's going on with the servers is to monitor them using a passive response time monitoring solution. These types of solutions provide a way to passively understand what the real application traffic is like for the servers of interest, including traffic volumes/rates, response times from the server, session and load indicators. If you also monitor these servers with
you would get greater visibility into discards, buffer queue depth, and error rates on the interfaces at the time utilization is high. These metrics tend to provide you greater visibility to understand what's going on at the time of peak activity levels for optimizing performance.
This was last published in October 2008
Dig Deeper on Campus area network
Network administration expert, Lindi Horton answers a query regarding file server troubleshooting. She explains potential reasons for file server ...
Network administration expert, Lindi Horton answers a query regarding packet vs. circuit switching in regards to data networks by using an analogy to...
Suffering slow VPN connection? Try checking VPN concentrators and caching.