mangpor2004 - stock.adobe.com
Every new wireless standard presents a fair amount of potential confusion to untangle.
The latest wireless standard, 802.11ax, also known as Wi-Fi 6, is now appearing in consumer hardware and starting to see early enterprise adoption. As a result, client device compatibility is one of the more frequent questions that comes up.
The actual standards are written by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The Wi-Fi Alliance doesn't write the standards, but it performs limited interoperability testing and issues various certifications based on the IEEE's work. To date, each new standard has backward compatibility as a fundamental construct.
So, Wi-Fi 6 backward compatibility is possible with previous wireless standards and devices. But there's more to the story, as always.
The problem with full backward compatibility
If you come to one of my wireless LAN (WLAN) environments with an older 802.11b device, you won't be able to connect. Why not? After all, I run 802.11ac wireless access points, and they promise backward compatibility with legacy clients. But, in reality, the standard isn't the final word, and this holds true with 802.11ax.
Backward compatibility sounds good on the surface, but it comes with a performance penalty that can drag down the lofty speeds promised by standards such as 802.11ac and 802.11ax. The deeper technical explanation comes down to optional data rates.
Some legacy client devices need speeds of 1 Mbps and 2 Mbps enabled on the WLAN to function. Many wireless networking professionals who run big Wi-Fi environments have had slower rates administratively turned off for several years to let the higher data rates prevail.
So, is Wi-Fi 6 backward-compatible? Yes and no.
By definition, the standard says absolutely yes. In reality, most networks are going to be configured in the name of performance tuning to skew away from total backward compatibility.
Generally, 802.11b rates of 1, 2, 5.5 and 11 Mbps are disabled -- but exceptions exist. Some environments also block some or all 802.11g rates as well. Most newer client devices will be minimally capable of 802.11n, but unfortunately, some of the more ill-conceived devices rely on cheap wireless chipsets and backward compatibility, which leads to frustration for both the device user and network administrator.
Dig Deeper on Wireless LAN (WLAN)
Related Q&A from Lee Badman
Although the terms WLAN and Wi-Fi are used interchangeably, the two wireless technologies are quite different. Fundamentally, Wi-Fi is just a type of... Continue Reading
Licensed and unlicensed frequency bands serve different purposes for wireless communications. Find out the differences between the two bands and the ... Continue Reading
When assessing Wi-Fi vs. Ethernet, each connection type has its benefits and drawbacks. Find out why one standard might be more reliable for your ... Continue Reading