In an ordinary infrastructure mode WLAN, an access point (AP) is responsible for sending beacons that define the capabilities of the WLAN, including supported data rates and required security ciphers. As a central point of control over the BSS, the AP can also make unilateral decisions, like changing the channel (to avoid interference) or turning on protection (when legacy stations are detected).
However, an IBSS lacks this centralized control; decision-making is distributed across all stations participating in the IBSS. For example, in a secure infrastructure mode WLAN, each station completes a four-way authentication handshake with the AP, deriving encryption keys to be used with AES or TKIP. The final 802.11i standard defines a modified version of this four-way handshake that must be exchanged between every pair of communicating stations participating in an IBSS. In effect, every pair of ad-hoc stations makes their own agreement about how to secure the frames they exchange, instead of having one AP establish a uniform security policy used by everyone.
So how does 802.11n impact IBSS operation? Areas given special attention in the 802.11n standard include power management (controlling how long stations doze to conserve battery life) and dynamic frequency selection (controlling when stations should start using a different channel). For example, if IBSS stations made independent decisions about switching channels in the presence of radar, several stations might detect interference simultaneously and announce a switch to different channels. To avoid this, 802.11n specifies rules whereby an IBSS dynamic frequency selection owner station (IDO STA) uses beacons, probe responses, or an extended channel switch announcement to inform other 802.11n stations about an impending channel change. Furthermore, a 20/40 MHz IBSS cannot be changed to a 20 MHz IBSS and a 20 MHz IBSS cannot be changed to a 20/40 MHz IBSS.
In addition, certain elements of high-throughput (HT) operation cannot be changed by beaconing different capabilities, including elements that control the use of reduced interframe spacing, legacy protection, Greenfield mode, and dual CTS protection. For example, 802.11n stations that are members of an IBSS are required to protect HT transmissions, HT Greenfield format frames, and reduced interface spacing sequences as though HT Protection were set to non-HT mixed mode. This requirement ensures compatibility with legacy stations, whether any legacy stations are present or not when 802.11n stations start to form IBSS associations.
Dig Deeper on Wireless LAN (WLAN)
Related Q&A from Lisa Phifer
As the remote workforce increases, network managers and users might opt to set up two concurrent VPN connections from the same remote device. But ... Continue Reading
Is there a difference between a wireless access point vs. a router? Yes -- while the two wireless devices are related, they meet different needs in a... Continue Reading
Learn the differences between site-to-site VPNs vs. remote-access VPNs and find out about the protocols, benefits and the data security methods used ... Continue Reading