As an expert in network management, could you please let me know what you think about AdRem NetCrunch for network monitoring?
I am actually NOT an expert on Network Management Systems (NMS) but I believe that there is significant overlap between network performance and network management.
This is yet another question that benefits from referencing back to an oft-referenced previous answer on the Best Practices for Network Monitoring https://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/answer/Practices-for-monitoring-a-networks-performance. This answer provides a high-level metric by which NetCrunch can be assessed. So let's look for some of those criteria in NetCrunch's description:
So overall, from a 50,000 feet, this looks like a reasonable low-cost substitute for the typically expensive NMS (e.g. OpenView or Tivoli). However, the rumor from the field is that most businesses find this traditional style of NMS to be ineffective, expensive to maintain, and they are typically shelved or only maintained at very simple levels. In general, the Enterprise NMS market has settled down and is no longer growing very actively.
That said, if the price is right and the functionality is focused in the right areas, it may be a good entrÉe for SMB (small/medium business) into important network management capabilities. It warrants some further investigation.
NOTE: I have no association with AdRem and I have only reviewed the capabilities of NetCrunch as they are described online.
Dig Deeper on Network management and monitoring
Related Q&A from Loki Jorgenson
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.