Home > Networking Tips > Routing and Switching > Rapid Spanning Tree
Networking Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

ROUTING AND SWITCHING

Rapid Spanning Tree


Tom Lancaster
06.28.2005
Rating: -3.60- (out of 5)


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


The venerable Spanning Tree Protocol, created by IBM back in the Dark Ages and standardized by the IEEE as 802.1D, has been a weak link from the beginning, but rapidly approached "galactically annoying" status in the '90s when network designers became enamored with VLAN trunking. The problem in a nutshell was that STP, which was designed with Source-Route Bridging in mind, had no mechanism to elegantly accommodate the various paths of multiple virtual networks traversing the same physical link. The result was adding a lot of confusion to the already painfully slow reconvergence time. To deal with these issues, some vendors created proprietary hacks to the protocol that had the effect of dramatically reducing the convergence time, but increasing complexity and by extension, hampering troubleshooting.

The good news, though, is that at the end of the last century, the IEEE proposed standards 802.1s and 802.1w, which were ratified in the 2002/2003 timeframe. These standards improve on the proprietary improvements by adding capabilities for multiple VLANs, and by cleaning up the base Spanning Tree algorithm, which essentially turns it into a connection-oriented protocol instead of the old method, where switches just broadcast BPDUs and waited for their timers to expire, with no confirmation of receipt. This is somewhat comparable to the difference between RIP and OSFP routing protocols in both the concept and the relative time to converge.

So, if you currently have a network that involves a lot of layer 2 connections between switches, and especially if you're doing a lot of VLAN trunking, you should put some serious thought into "Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol" (RSTP) as 802.1w is known. It's possible to improve your recovery time after a switch failure from 3-60 seconds, depending on how well you tweaked the timers, to 100-300 ms without any timer-tweaking required. In fact, the recovery using RSTP is faster than 802.1D with extensions like PortFast, BackboneFast and UplinkFast.


Tom Lancaster, CCIE# 8829 CNX# 1105, is a consultant with 15 years experience in the networking industry, and co-author of several books on networking, most recently, CCSPTM: Secure PIX and Secure VPN Study Guide published by Sybex.


Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchNetworking.com.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
Routing and Switching
How to test LAN switch energy efficiency
Testing LAN switch power consumption: A best practices guide
Dynamic IP routing and routing protocols
Monitor your network traffic with MRTG
How routers work: An overview for networking pros
Secure Cisco routers against IOS flaw attack
Network summarization -- Supernetting and wildcard masks
Routing: Five common, easily avoided errors
Router Expert: Building a WLAN proxy server, implementing ASR
Router Expert: Building a WLAN proxy server, implementing WPAD

Network Hardware
Unified wireless network still a work in progress for vendors
3Com acquisition confirms HP-Cisco battle for China
Juniper to CIOs: Invest in internal cloud computing networks
802.11n wireless APs bring IP video to sprawling Illinois high school
802.11n upgrade: College ditches legacy network for new vendor
Network device management overload: Engineers managing too many boxes
What is network infrastructure and what is a hybrid network?
What preventative maintenance procedures for network devices exist?
Can wireless adapters operate as client access points to make SoftAPs?
Is there VLAN software recommend for Realtek NICs?
Network Hardware Research

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
core router  (SearchNetworking.com)
fiber jumper  (SearchNetworking.com)
flow routing  (SearchNetworking.com)
foreign agent  (SearchNetworking.com)
foreign network  (SearchNetworking.com)
hardware load-balancing device  (SearchNetworking.com)
logical router  (SearchNetworking.com)
mrouter  (SearchNetworking.com)
patch cord  (SearchNetworking.com)
port interface card (PIC)  (SearchNetworking.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.



Networking Solutions for Business

Alcatel-Lucent Network Business Communications Solutions

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts