Home > Networking News > More than 1 million DNS servers still vulnerable to Kaminsky
Networking News:
EMAIL THIS

More than 1 million DNS servers still vulnerable to Kaminsky

By Shamus McGillicuddy, News Editor
12 Nov 2008 | SearchNetworking.com

Routing and switching news, advice and technical information
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google

New research has found that about 1.3 million domain name servers across the world are still exploitable by the Kaminsky vulnerability, a flaw hackers can easily use to bring down websites and email servers.

Domain name system (DNS) servers are the address books of the Internet. They translate URLs into IP addresses, allowing clients and servers to communicate across the Internet.

In July, security expert Dan Kaminsky revealed that he had discovered a flaw in the DNS protocol. The DNS flaw allows hackers to impersonate any website and trap unsuspecting users. Hackers can also use the flaw to disrupt corporate operations by making the DNS system misdirect emails and website queries. Exploiting the flaw, hackers conduct a "cache poisoning" attack by flooding DNS servers with queries and tricking the servers into mistranslating a URL into another IP address. Kaminsky worked with DNS software vendors to create a patch for the flaw.

Infoblox, a vendor of DNS management technology, recently completed its fourth annual global survey of DNS servers. In all, the survey found 11.9 million name servers across the world, according to Cricket Liu, vice president of architecture for Infoblox.

Nearly 11% of those DNS servers, about 1.3 million, are "trivially exploitable" by the Kaminsky vulnerability, Liu said. In other words, no one has bothered to patch them. "The scripts and Metasploits that are available out there would compromise a name server like that in as little as 10 seconds," he said. "So it's a pretty lousy result. On the other hand, maybe we should be pleased that [the rest] of the servers were patched over the last three months."

The first line of defense against the Kaminsky vulnerability is to reconfigure DNS servers to accept only non-recursive queries rather than recursive ones, Liu said. Recursive DNS servers will accept queries about any domain name from just about any source. Most DNS attacks rely on recursive queries to attack name servers. When servers are reconfigured for only non-recursive queries, the servers will respond only to queries about the domain name for which it is the authority.

More on DNS security

Configuring DNS server properties

How to patch Kaminsky's DNS vulnerability

Liu said that 44% of DNS servers are still configured for recursive queries, a slight improvement from 52% in 2007.

"Those open recursive name servers are at greater risk for cache poisoning," he said. "They're also easy to use in distributed denial-of-service attacks against people on the Internet."

The second line of defense against the Kaminsky vulnerability is the patch that configures DNS servers for query port randomization. Liu said this configuration instructs a server to send each query to a different random port, making it difficult for a hacker to spoof the server.

"The [hacker] would have to guess which port [the query] came from, and you would have to randomly try sending query responses to a lot of different source ports," Liu said.

The ultimate protection against Kaminsky and other vulnerabilities is to upgrade DNS servers to DNSSEC (DNS Security Extensions), a set of modifications to the DNS protocol that, when uploaded to the DNS server, improves security on DNS servers, Liu said. Unfortunately, DNS management is an afterthought in most organizations. DNSSEC adoption is still minuscule.

DNSstuff.com, a provider of online DNS management tools, recently conducted its own survey of about 450 of its users, according to Paul Parisi, DNSstuff CTO. Parisi said that 9.6% of his customers said they hadn't patched their servers for Kaminsky, and another 21.9% didn't know whether the servers were patched or not.

"That is pretty staggering, given our community," Parisi said. "These are the people who use our tools to manage DNS."

The cache poisoning that can result from the Kaminsky exploit is nevertheless a top concern, he said. The DNSstuff survey found that 44.1% of customers identified accuracy and relevance of DNS data as their biggest management challenge.

"There is a heightened awareness of it, but the survey shows that some people need some help managing it," Parisi said. "They need some best practices, and because DNS is something you touch infrequently, a lot of issues can come up with DNS just because of simple mistakes. There is a hunger out there for proper DNS reporting and management."

Let us know what you think about the story; email: Shamus McGillicuddy, News Editor



Tags: Network Security Best Practices and ProductsIP NetworkingVIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Network Security Best Practices and Products
2010 predictions: What's the worst network security threat this year?
Best of 2009: Computer networking advice
Network security forecast 2010: Startups cash out, uber-devices step up
Mobile computing security concerns lead to more IPS, SSL VPN spending
How do I change my security setting to allow ActiveX?
What are two common devices that control outbound network access?
3Com acquisition confirms HP-Cisco battle for China
Enterprises demand next-generation firewalls with IPS, app visibility
Preventing hacker attacks with network behavior analysis IPS
Is there a way to trace my stolen laptop computer?

IP Networking
What is the difference between IP address and machine address?
Frame relay vs. ATM networks: What's the difference?
Best of 2009: Computer networking advice
From slots to robots: Vegas resort runs it all on converged IP network
What is the definition of ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode)?
Do I have to disable DHCP on my router to create a DHCP server?
Windows Server 2008 IP routing configuration: Static and dynamic RIPv2
What is IP?
Connect your LAN to the Internet using static or dynamic NAT
Using tracert and TTL to troubleshoot network connectivity problems

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
anti-replay protocol  (SearchNetworking.com)
dynamic packet filter  (SearchNetworking.com)
HELLO packet  (SearchNetworking.com)
packet filtering  (SearchNetworking.com)
rule base  (SearchNetworking.com)
stateful inspection  (SearchNetworking.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



Comprehensive network management resources, expert solutions, and professional research informing your technology decisions
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2010, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts