Home > Networking News > Network access control vendors: Attraction vs. retention
Networking News:
EMAIL THIS

Network access control vendors: Attraction vs. retention

By Andrew R. Hickey, News Editor
30 Aug 2007 | SearchNetworking.com

News on networking, mobility and voice
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google

Network access control (NAC) vendors' marketing campaigns may make their products more attractive to companies, but smaller vendors still dominate when it comes to customer retention, according to recent statistics released by Current Analysis.

Andrew Braunberg, Current Analysis' research director, said his firm's annual NAC study found that a strong marketing budget and message put certain vendors at top of mind among companies considering and planning NAC deployments.

Not surprisingly, Cisco's Network Admission Control appliance and framework hold the top two spots respectively as the most attractive network access control solutions to potential customers who have not yet deployed NAC.

According to Current Analysis' study, 45% of respondents said they would consider putting Cisco's NAC appliance in their networks, while 41% said Cisco's NAC framework is also an attractive option. Cisco was closely followed by Microsoft's Network Access Protection, which 21% of respondents said they'd consider for their network access control deployment.

Check Point, Juniper Networks, Sygate/Symantec, 3Com/Tipping Point, Trend Micro, McAfee/Foundstone, HP ProCurve, IBM Tivoli, Nortel, CA and Bradford Networks rounded out the list of vendors that potential NAC users would consider or found attractive, ranging from 5% to 15% of respondents.

The survey took data from roughly 300 highly qualified respondents who are actively involved in NAC implementation or planning within their organizations.

Braunberg said Cisco led the pack of attractive vendors because the networking powerhouse has been hammering home its NAC message for almost three years, making the name Cisco nearly synonymous with network access control in the minds of IT professionals.

"Cisco's been banging this drum about NAC harder and longer than anyone else," he said. "They've been actively pushing it. No one has the mindshare that Cisco has. Cisco no doubt is attracting large numbers to try their products. You can see clearly that Cisco has been very effective at driving NAC awareness. Nobody comes close."

But while Cisco dominates in vendor attraction, the company falls near the middle when it comes to retention.

"The retention scores and the attraction scores are much different," Braunberg said.

Retention scores are the percentage of respondents who are NAC customers of a certain vendor and would consider that same vendor for future NAC investments.

CA topped the list of vendor retention scores with 81%, followed by Juniper Networks at 80%, Bradford Networks at 78%, Check Point at 71%, and Nortel at 71%. Rounding out the category were HP ProCurve, Cisco CNAC, Cisco NAC appliance, Microsoft, McAfee/Foundstone, Sygate Symantec, 3Com/TippingPoint, IBM Tivoli and Trend Micro.

For more on NAC
Find out the questions to ask in your NAC RFP

Check out a tip on using NAC to tighten VPNs

Learn how NAC appliances are a good shortcut
Braunberg is quick to point out that retention does not imply market share but does indicate that current users of those vendors' solutions are pleased with them and would continue using them going forward.

"It's a huge mix because NAC touches so many points in the infrastructure," he said. "There are a number of different players that make NAC solutions."

Braunberg said some of the vendors with high retention scores -- CA, IBM Tivoli and HP ProCurve, for example -- were surprising because those vendors don't push NAC solutions per se but may add some NAC components to their larger suites of products -- system, security, threat and identity management. At the same time, users vary in their perceptions of NAC. Some look at pure network access control; others consider host discovery, scanning and other security components as contributing to NAC.

"Professional services groups are delivering enough NAC functionality to make companies comfortable," Braunberg said. "Because the market continues to evolve, the big vendors have the mindshare but not always the market share. I wouldn't dismiss anyone from these results. It's a huge market from a vendor point of view. It's hard to differentiate yourself in a lot of ways. If you can find a good niche, you can certainly have success."

One surprising vendor earning a high retention score is Bradford Networks, he said, which last year's Current Analysis NAC study didn't even track. Bradford found its niche in education deployments and continued to gain momentum.

"This year's NAC study demonstrates again that no vendor can match Cisco in its ability to attract attention to its NAC solutions, and this is true for both its NAC appliance and the broader CNAC framework," Braunberg said. "What is interesting, however, is that many vendors are clearly meeting market demands and satisfying customer needs for NAC functionality, and this includes several of the smaller pure-play vendors."

Tags: Network Access ControlNetwork Security Best Practices and ProductsVIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Network Access Control
What are two common devices that control outbound network access?
Using NAC for smartphone security on wireless LAN
Network security risks multiply when enterprises begin outsourcing
Dynamic policy ensures faster, safer network for school district
NAC appliance vendors: Can you depend on them?
NAC integration at the endpoint
Extending NAC enforcement to network security devices
Integrating NAC with network security tools
Network access control market crushed by economy, but future is bright
Joel Snyder discusses Network Access Control Day at Interop Las Vegas

Network Security Best Practices and Products
How do I change my security setting to allow ActiveX?
What are two common devices that control outbound network access?
3Com acquisition confirms HP-Cisco battle for China
Enterprises demand next-generation firewalls with IPS, app visibility
Preventing hacker attacks with network behavior analysis IPS
Is there a way to trace my stolen laptop computer?
Integrating NAC with network security tools
Should organizations separate technical from administrative security?
What network equipment is needed to secure a small business LAN?
Ethical hacking and countermeasures: Network penetration testing intro

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
network access control  (SearchNetworking.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



Comprehensive network management resources, expert solutions, and professional research informing your technology decisions
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts