Access "Deep packet inspection tools: Proxy vs. stream-based"
This article is part of the August 2012 Vol. 3, No. 4 issue of Data center fabric wars
Deep packet inspection (DPI) tools have been mostly associated with service provider networks, but enterprise network managers are increasingly turning to the technology to better manage application performance and ensure a greater level of security. Basic firewalls inspect packet headers to ensure that HTTP requests go only to the Web server and that SMTP traffic is directed to the email server, but this does not protect against Web attacks or email-borne malware. DPI tools, on the other hand, inspect the entire contents of a packet and determine performance based on which application layer protocol is in use. As such, DPI makes it possible to find, identify, classify, reroute or block packets with specific data or code payloads that conventional packet filtering cannot detect. DPI tools: Stream vs. proxy-based Packet inspection strategies can be broken into two categories: stream-based and proxy-based. Stream-based inspection examines the data in each incoming packet as it arrives. If no threat is found, the packet is forwarded to its destination. ... Access >>>
Access TechTarget
Premium Content for Free.
What's Inside
Features
-
-
Data center network fabrics vs. software – defined fabrics
by Shamus McGillicuddy
Are data center fabrics and software defined networks competitive or complementary technologies?
-
Deep packet inspection tools: Proxy vs. stream-based
by David B. Jacobs, Contributor
As more enterprises consider deep packet inspection tools, network managers must choose the technique that works best for them.
-
Data center network fabrics vs. software – defined fabrics
by Shamus McGillicuddy
-
-
With network fabrics, choosing a vendor means commitment
by Michael Morisy
Can incompatible fabrics be good for data center networking?
-
Using wireless network bandwidth monitoring to stay within data caps
by Lisa Phifer, Wireless Expert
Wireless network bandwidth monitoring is important for users who must remain within data caps that are often broken by smartphone/tablets and cloud services.
-
With network fabrics, choosing a vendor means commitment
by Michael Morisy
-
News
-
VMware networking CTO on SDN, OpenFlow and network virtualization
by Shamus McGillicuddy
VMware networking CTO Allwyn Sequeira explains the software-defined data center, the future of OpenFlow and how the company already has network virtualization 'nailed.'
-
VMware networking CTO on SDN, OpenFlow and network virtualization
by Shamus McGillicuddy
-
Columns
-
Point-Counterpoint: Do both SDN and data center network fabrics fail?
by Rivka Gewirtz Little
In this point-counterpoint feature, two network engineers turned-bloggers—Ivan Pepelnjak of IOS hints and Brad Casemore of Twilight in the Valley of Nerds—take opposing sides in the battle of network fabric vs. SDN. Read both, and see which side you agree with.
-
Point-Counterpoint: Do both SDN and data center network fabrics fail?
by Rivka Gewirtz Little
More Premium Content Accessible For Free
Hybrid Cloud networking falls short, but not for long
E-Zine
As if network management isn’t hard enough, now engineers must find ways to manage physical networks, virtual networks and SDN environments. In this ...
BYOD challenges that lurk beyond network security
E-Zine
Every access network now must be engineered to enable, manage and secure BYOD. In this edition of Network Evolution, we offer insight into ...
The new network: SDN gets real
E-Zine
As the software-defined networking (SDN) hype is replaced by real products, this edition of The New Network will look at the current state of SDN ...
Network Management Strategies for the CIO