Access your Pro+ Content below.
Software-defined networking could make Network-as-a-Service a reality
This article is part of the Network Evolution issue of October 2012 Vol 3, No. 5
Buyers are already sold on Infrastructure-as-a-Service, Platform-as-a-Service and Software-as-a-Service, but what about Network-as-a-Service? Despite the fact that the cloud is created in and connected through the network, we hear little or nothing about a new network paradigm for the cloud. Network-as-a-service is not only real, but it is likely to become universal. However, it may take software-defined networking (SDN) in the form of OpenFlow to make that happen. Cloud computing deploys a public pool of resources that can be provisioned on demand. They also must provide connections to its users, storage access, inter-process communications, and resource allocation or management. Typical IP and Ethernet network technologies have shortfalls when it comes to the cloud, due to security, QoS, and operational cost scalability. At the heart of those limitations is the notion of “permissive connectivity.” IP and Ethernet presume that all endpoints can be addressed by others. This presumption of universal connectivity makes it harder ...
Access this PRO+ Content for Free!
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
Features in this issue
Software-defined networking could solve the problems that Ethernet and IP networking pose to Network-as-a-Service by centralizing a connection permission policy.
To handle mass server virtualization and Infrastructure-as-a-Service, IT teams need network virtualization with fluid provisioning. Will that require a network hypervisor?
Manual networks stifle the otherwise automated private cloud. Can software defined networking and network virtualization solve the problem?
News in this issue
Network virtualization tool FlowVisor boosts software defined networking by allowing easy slicing of physical networks into multiple logical pieces.
The software-defined networking battle boils down to one basic difference in strategy: open source or proprietary. Which side will win? Maybe neither one.