Clearly, many steps are required to create and operate a highly-reliable WLAN, from rigorous design and proper instrumentation to monitoring processes and tools that enable not just reactive but proactive performance management. The 7/24 wireless quality assurance systems like those that you mention are important because they don't simply set QoS levels and try to meet them – they actually measure delivered QoS in the live WLAN and help operators react to correct impending problems and satisfy SLAs.
For example, most WLAN controllers and management systems poll APs for traffic counters to generate maintain historical performance statistics. When something goes seriously wrong, WLAN controllers may react – for example, by increasing power on adjacent APs when another AP goes down or usage thresholds are reached. While this keeps the WLAN operating and gives you a feel for past performance, it doesn't ensure that QoS targets are being achieved. Clients could be connected at high data rates but still receive too little airtime or too much interference to keep users and applications happy.
WLAN quality assurance systems can offer added functionality. For starters, they can scan the air full-time to obtain a near-real-time view of WLAN performance. Second, they can compare actual performance to defined targets, triggering events that speed corrective actions – either manually or through execution of defined rules – before users and applications are significantly impacted. Third, quality assurance systems can run automated, periodic performance tests to measure end-to-end throughput, latency, and jitter – in other words, measuring what users and applications are truly experiencing.
Of course, if your WLAN is not designed to manage call admission, prioritize traffic, or deliver high-throughput, or low latency a quality assurance system won't magically meet SLAs that require that kind of network infrastructure. However, full-time, automated, service-level monitoring and real-time response systems can play an essential role in helping a well-designed WLAN to operate at its best.
Related Q&A from Lisa Phifer, Wireless Networking Expert
Wireless expert Lisa A. Phifer explains to what extent WEP cracking remains a worrisome issue. It all depends on your company's WLAN security policy.continue reading
Wireless expert, Lisa Phifer explains that it may not be worth enhancing Wi-Fi ad hoc mode since Wi-Fi Direct is a better alternative for enabling ...continue reading
Wireless expert Lisa Phifer responds to a question regarding a Mi-Fi and Android smartphone mobile hotspot comparison. She provides an in depth ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.