In IPv4, do private address ranges have a default subnet mask?

In IPv4, do private address ranges have a default subnet mask?

In this expert response, Silvia Hagen explains the relationship between private IP address range and default subnet masks. She also informs us about new address types coming up in IPv6 that will make subnetting and addressing easier.

QUESTION: In IPv4, do the private addresses of range 10 series, 172 series, and 192 series have a default subnet mask?

For example: 10 series belongs to Class A IP addressing, but can we use default subnet mask of Class C 255.255.255.0 for it?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    Login

    By submitting your registration information to SearchNetworking.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchNetworking.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

No they do not. Many companies in fact use addresses out of the 10 range but subnet them like a Class C address depending on the requirements of their networks.

With IPv6, there are no private address ranges defined anymore. NAT is something we should get rid of, because it breaks the end-to-end model. With IPv6 there are new address types used. For instance, you could use the link-local or site-local IPv6 address for internal communication that doesn't have to be routed to the Internet.

This was first published in September 2008